re: Microsoft silverlight Friday, January 22, 2010 at 9:57 am Windows Vista Annoyances Discussion Forum Posted by Ricer46 (23818 messages posted) No, it's just another one of the many bungled efforts by M$, that we have to suffer with. On Friday, January 22, 2010 at 8:44 am, Alan Masterman wrote: >I once read that one of the big ideas behind dotnetfx was to eliminate the need for >a separate Windows registry, thus leading to huge improvements in security, stability >etc... doesn't seem to have happened, though, does it? Written in response to: re: Microsoft silverlight (Alan Masterman: Friday, January 22, 2010 at 8:44 am) There are presently no replies to this message. All messages in this thread [show all] Microsoft silverlight (Gio7707: Wed, Jan 20, 2010, 9:18 pm) re: Microsoft silverlight (Adam Bradley: Wed, Jan 20, 2010, 10:46 pm) re: Microsoft silverlight (Alan Masterman: Thu, Jan 21, 2010, 4:17 am) re: Microsoft silverlight (MartinM: Thu, Jan 21, 2010, 5:54 am) re: Microsoft silverlight (Alan Masterman: Fri, Jan 22, 2010, 8:16 am) re: Microsoft silverlight (Ricer46: Fri, Jan 22, 2010, 9:58 am) re: Microsoft silverlight (Alan Masterman: Fri, Jan 22, 2010, 8:44 am) re: Microsoft silverlight (Ricer46: Fri, Jan 22, 2010, 9:57 am) re: Microsoft silverlight (Ricer46: Thu, Jan 21, 2010, 7:09 am) re: Microsoft silverlight (Steve: Thu, Jan 21, 2010, 6:23 am) re: Microsoft silverlight (Gio7707: Thu, Jan 21, 2010, 7:10 am) re: Microsoft silverlight (Adam Bradley: Thu, Jan 21, 2010, 7:06 pm) re: Microsoft silverlight (Alan Masterman: Fri, Jan 22, 2010, 7:48 am) Reply or follow-up to this message Search this forum Start a new thread on a different subject Report abuse of the forum Return to the Windows Vista Discussion Forum