Recent Messages (page 9 of 6272)

Explorer.exe : Illegal Operation (Sudhindra: Wed, Feb 17, 2010, 6:42 am)

re: Explorer.exe : Illegal Operation (Matt Rengers: Wed, Feb 17, 2010, 11:40 am)

re: Explorer.exe : Illegal Operation (gewg_: Wed, Feb 17, 2010, 11:54 am)

re: Explorer.exe : Illegal Operation (gewg_: Wed, Feb 17, 2010, 11:45 am)

Opera 10.5 beta available (Smoking JavaScript performance) (gewg_: Fri, Feb 12, 2010, 7:36 pm)

re: Opera 10.5 beta available (Smoking JavaScript performance) (Arminius: Sat, Feb 13, 2010, 4:00 pm)

re: Opera 10.5 beta available (Smoking JavaScript performance) (gewg_: Sat, Feb 13, 2010, 6:54 pm)

re: Opera 10.5 beta available (Smoking JavaScript performance) (Arminius: Mon, Feb 22, 2010, 5:00 pm)

re: Opera 10.5 beta available (Smoking JavaScript performance) (gewg_: Mon, Feb 22, 2010, 10:34 pm)

re: Opera 10.5 beta available (Smoking JavaScript performance) (Arminius: Wed, Feb 24, 2010, 1:13 am)

re: Opera 10.5 beta available (Smoking JavaScript performance) (Arminius: Tue, Mar 2, 2010, 7:37 am)

re: Opera 10.5 beta available (Smoking JavaScript performance) (gewg_: Tue, Mar 2, 2010, 10:28 am)

re: Opera 10.5 beta available (Smoking JavaScript performance) (Arminius: Tue, Mar 2, 2010, 5:16 pm)

re: Opera 10.5 beta available (Smoking JavaScript performance) (gewg_: Tue, Mar 2, 2010, 8:15 pm)

re: Opera 10.5 beta available (Smoking JavaScript performance) (Arminius: Tue, Mar 2, 2010, 9:11 pm)

re: Opera 10.5 beta available (Smoking JavaScript performance) (Arminius: Fri, Mar 5, 2010, 4:08 pm)

Opera 10.51 snapshot available (Arminius: Thu, Mar 11, 2010, 5:35 pm)

Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (Vicki Macina: Sat, Feb 6, 2010, 8:07 pm)

re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (gewg_: Sat, Feb 6, 2010, 10:35 pm)

re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (Ed: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 5:41 am)

re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (Vicki Macina: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 9:01 am)

re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (gewg_: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 10:06 am)

re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (Vicki Macina: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 10:17 am)

re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (gewg_: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 11:56 am)

re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (Vicki Macina: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 12:12 pm)

re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (gewg_: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 2:26 pm)

re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (dhm: Fri, Feb 12, 2010, 3:48 am)

[Thread drift] The ISP cartel sucks (gewg_: Fri, Feb 12, 2010, 11:20 am)

[Thread drift] The ISP cartel getting competition (gewg_: Sun, Feb 14, 2010, 6:05 pm)

ISPs' service doesn't *have* to suck (was: Protocol 1 error 59...) (gewg_: Fri, Feb 19, 2010, 4:30 pm)

re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (Vicki Macina: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 10:20 am)

re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (gewg_: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 9:49 am)

IE6 being phased out at Google (sekirt: Mon, Feb 1, 2010, 4:35 am)

re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Mon, Feb 1, 2010, 11:14 am)

re: IE6 being phased out at Google (jack hall: Thu, Feb 4, 2010, 8:39 am)

re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Thu, Feb 4, 2010, 12:26 pm)

re: IE6 being phased out at Google (sekirt: Thu, Feb 4, 2010, 5:25 pm)

re: IE6 being phased out at Google (jack hall: Thu, Feb 4, 2010, 6:28 pm)

re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Fri, Feb 5, 2010, 10:43 am)

re: IE6 being phased out at Google (Arminius: Sun, Feb 7, 2010, 6:31 am)

re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Sun, Feb 7, 2010, 12:09 pm)

re: IE6 being phased out at Google (sekirt: Sat, Feb 6, 2010, 6:51 am)

re: IE6 being phased out at Google (Arminius: Mon, Feb 8, 2010, 7:45 am)

re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Mon, Feb 8, 2010, 1:32 pm)

re: IE6 being phased out at Google (Arminius: Tue, Feb 9, 2010, 4:40 am)

re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Tue, Feb 9, 2010, 9:29 pm)

Spoofing the User Agent in IE6, in Firefox, and in Opera (Ed: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 4:10 am)

re: Spoofing the User Agent [won't solve the problem] (gewg_: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 10:04 am)

re: Spoofing the User Agent [won't solve the problem] (douglas: Sun, Feb 21, 2010, 1:38 am)

re: Spoofing the User Agent [won't solve the problem] (gewg_: Sun, Feb 21, 2010, 11:32 am)

re: Spoofing the User Agent [won't solve the problem] MORE DETAILS (gewg_: Tue, Jul 5, 2011, 7:31 pm)

Requirements for using HTML5 websites (gewg_: Thu, Aug 11, 2011, 12:05 pm)

re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (Arminius: Thu, Aug 11, 2011, 4:17 pm)

re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (gewg_: Thu, Aug 11, 2011, 5:26 pm)

re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (Arminius: Thu, Aug 11, 2011, 6:15 pm)

re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (gewg_: Thu, Aug 11, 2011, 11:21 pm)

re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (Arminius: Fri, Aug 12, 2011, 6:13 am)

re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (gewg_: Fri, Aug 12, 2011, 2:37 pm)

re: Spoofing the User Agent in IE6, in Firefox, and in Opera (gerald Keene: Thu, May 5, 2011, 12:09 pm)

re: Spoofing the User Agent in IE6, in Firefox, and in Opera (Ed: Mon, Jul 18, 2011, 6:06 am)

re: Spoofing the User Agent [is a waste of time for this] (gewg_: Mon, Jul 18, 2011, 1:46 pm)

Won't boot (jack hall: Mon, Jan 25, 2010, 5:40 pm)

re: Won't boot (gewg_: Mon, Jan 25, 2010, 7:52 pm)

re: Won't boot (jack hall: Thu, Jan 28, 2010, 12:05 pm)

re: Won't boot (gewg_: Thu, Jan 28, 2010, 1:21 pm)

invalid vxd dynamic link call to device number 3, service b (James Van Allen: Mon, Jan 25, 2010, 1:19 pm)

re: invalid vxd dynamic link call to device number 3, service b (gewg_: Mon, Jan 25, 2010, 2:57 pm)

re: invalid vxd dynamic link call to device number 3, service b (Arminius: Mon, Jan 25, 2010, 5:29 pm)

re: invalid vxd dynamic link call to device number 3, service b (James Van Allen: Fri, Feb 12, 2010, 9:57 pm)

drivers for Altus LX-W103 2.4Ghz Wireless Optical Mouse (Shane T. Teng: Sat, Jan 23, 2010, 7:39 pm)

re: drivers for Altus LX-W103 2.4Ghz Wireless Optical Mouse (gewg_: Sun, Jan 24, 2010, 2:15 pm)

Black Hats are STILL finding security holes to exploit in Internet Exploder 6 (gewg_: Tue, Jan 19, 2010, 11:41 am)

re: Black Hats are STILL finding security holes to exploit in Internet Exploder 6 (Steve: Tue, Jan 19, 2010, 1:08 pm)

re: Black Hats are STILL finding security holes to exploit in Internet Exploder 6 (gewg_: Tue, Jan 19, 2010, 3:25 pm)

re: Black Hats are STILL finding security holes to exploit in Internet Exploder 6 (gewg_: Wed, Jan 20, 2010, 1:28 pm)

re: Black Hats are STILL finding security holes to exploit in Internet Exploder 6 (Steve: Wed, Jan 20, 2010, 1:37 pm)

re: Black Hats are STILL finding security holes to exploit in Internet Exploder 6 (Alan Masterman: Sat, Jan 30, 2010, 9:01 am)

re: Black Hats are STILL finding security holes to exploit in Internet Exploder 6 (gewg_: Sat, Jan 30, 2010, 12:05 pm)

Wanna see a company that is SERIOUS about security? (gewg_: Mon, Feb 1, 2010, 11:46 am)

Another app drops support for Win9x (gewg_: Fri, Dec 25, 2009, 3:19 pm)

Problems in WIN 98SE (Dave A.: Thu, Dec 24, 2009, 11:03 am)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (gewg_: Thu, Dec 24, 2009, 1:28 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (dhm: Thu, Dec 24, 2009, 8:51 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (C K: Thu, Dec 24, 2009, 3:52 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Dave A.: Fri, Dec 25, 2009, 9:11 am)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Arminius: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 12:25 am)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Dave A.: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 8:27 am)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (C K: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 11:16 am)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Dave A.: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 12:30 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (C K: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 1:16 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Dave A.: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 1:39 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (C K: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 2:02 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (gewg_: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 2:31 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Dave A.: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 3:18 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (C K: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 3:41 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Dave A.: Sun, Dec 27, 2009, 5:23 am)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (C K: Sun, Dec 27, 2009, 10:53 am)

ps.... (C K: Sun, Dec 27, 2009, 11:05 am)

re: ps.... (Dave A.: Sun, Dec 27, 2009, 12:28 pm)

re: ps.... (C K: Sun, Dec 27, 2009, 4:51 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (C K: Sun, Dec 27, 2009, 9:11 am)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Arminius: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 2:16 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (gewg_: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 2:25 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Arminius: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 2:33 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (gewg_: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 2:40 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Arminius: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 3:13 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Arminius: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 10:50 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (gewg_: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 2:25 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Dave A.: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 5:56 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (gewg_: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 7:16 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Arminius: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 9:44 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Dave A.: Sun, Dec 27, 2009, 12:49 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Arminius: Sun, Dec 27, 2009, 7:51 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Dave A.: Mon, Dec 28, 2009, 2:53 am)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Dave A.: Sun, Dec 27, 2009, 1:13 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Dave A.: Sat, Dec 26, 2009, 5:46 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Ed: Wed, Jan 6, 2010, 12:04 am)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Dave A.: Thu, Jan 7, 2010, 11:26 am)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE [SOLVED] (gewg_: Thu, Jan 7, 2010, 4:16 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE [SOLVED] (Dave A.: Fri, Jan 8, 2010, 2:58 am)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Arminius: Thu, Jan 7, 2010, 6:33 pm)

re: Problems in WIN 98SE (Dave A.: Fri, Jan 8, 2010, 3:08 am)

• Post a new message
• Sign in / set forum preferences

• Search this forum