Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1265975332 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error
Friday, February 12, 2010 at 3:48 am
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by dhm (1069 messages posted)


"There may, however, be good news in sight. The end of the era of sucky, anti-competitive ISPs may be drawing to a close: ...as opposed to the status quo:"

I was recently blacklisted by AT&T for hanging up on a telemarketer. Per an agreement with the gov't they were to provide $10/month DSL. First, they hid it on their website. I was surprised recently to find it was no longer hidden but right next to the $19.95 for the same service. Their new method of cheating was to deny it to anyone on the basis that you did not supply a credit card number for which they provided no box. I called up to say I'd send them a check. I was told they had a rule against it. The telemarketer girl provided misinformation that the offer could only be made thru the website and anyway it didn't exist. I was about to subscribe to their service but said to the woman, "I'm too tired to think." She said, "There's nothing to think about. I'll do your thinking for you." And I politely hung up.

After thinking about it, I remembered my current ISP resells AT&T's service. I always pay them with a yearly check. I have never given a credit card number to an ISP. I have never given a credit card number to AT&T. So I called and arranged to send them a check. 5 days later they told me AT&T would not do it. Allegedly DSL cannot be connected here. In reality the fiber optic cables are 100 ft from my front door, some neighbors on the block have DSL and even if it was copper wire I am only 1/2 mile from the AT&T's downtown substation. I can only conclude that AT&T has blacklisted me for hanging up on one of their telemarketers.

From experience in year's past I know that AT&T outsources this service, often to the most irresponsible people who work on commission. There has been an attempt to slam me for extra services which was thwarted because they don't have a credit card number. You shouldn't give credit cards to unreliable companies. Since AT&T takes no responsibility and gives great power to low ranking employees ...


Written in response to:
re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (gewg_: Thursday, February 11, 2010 at 11:56 am)

Responses to this message:
*[Thread drift] The ISP cartel sucks (gewg_: Friday, February 12, 2010 at 11:20 am)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (Vicki Macina: Sat, Feb 6, 2010, 8:07 pm)
*re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (gewg_: Sat, Feb 6, 2010, 10:35 pm)
-re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (Ed: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 5:41 am)
-re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (Vicki Macina: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 9:01 am)
-re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (gewg_: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 10:06 am)
-re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (Vicki Macina: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 10:17 am)
-re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (gewg_: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 11:56 am)
-re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (Vicki Macina: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 12:12 pm)
*re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (gewg_: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 2:26 pm)
-re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (dhm: Fri, Feb 12, 2010, 3:48 am)
*[Thread drift] The ISP cartel sucks (gewg_: Fri, Feb 12, 2010, 11:20 am)
*[Thread drift] The ISP cartel getting competition (gewg_: Sun, Feb 14, 2010, 6:05 pm)
*ISPs' service doesn't *have* to suck (was: Protocol 1 error 59...) (gewg_: Fri, Feb 19, 2010, 4:30 pm)
*re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (Vicki Macina: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 10:20 am)
*re: Protocol 1 error 59 failed a networking error (gewg_: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 9:49 am)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright ©1995-2012 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.