re: Lights, Action, No Desktop. Sunday, June 15, 2008 at 6:18 pm Windows 95 Annoyances Discussion Forum Posted by Bruce King (5 messages posted) Hi, Benoit, Thanks for your reply. That's an interesting and optimistic bit of slant on where I'm at with this. I agree that having someone knowledgable look it over sounds like common sense. [POINT OF INFORMATION: I'm a long-term professional freelance. Do you think that Mac's generally serves writers better than the seemingly biz-oriented PC's? If this is far afield for you just ignore it.] I appreciate your thought. bruce On Saturday, June 14, 2008 at 6:41 am, Benoit wrote: > Is there likely to be something inherently defective with ANY Win95? > Not at all. I still use it myself. > I'd advise you get someone to look at your PC if you don't have any idea what's >wrong with it. Maybe you forgot some wire, or something. Written in response to: re: Lights, Action, No Desktop. (Benoit: Saturday, June 14, 2008 at 6:41 am) There are presently no replies to this message. All messages in this thread [show all] Lights, Action, No Desktop. (Bruce King: Thu, Jun 12, 2008, 10:08 pm) re: Lights, Action, No Desktop. (Keith Stanier: Fri, Jun 13, 2008, 7:22 am) re: Lights, Action, No Desktop. (Bruce King: Fri, Jun 13, 2008, 8:41 pm) re: Lights, Action, No Desktop. (Keith Stanier: Sat, Jun 14, 2008, 6:31 am) re: Lights, Action, No Desktop. (Benoit: Sun, Jun 15, 2008, 10:01 am) re: Lights, Action, No Desktop. (Bruce King: Sun, Jun 15, 2008, 6:34 pm) re: Lights, Action, No Desktop. (Benoit: Sat, Jun 14, 2008, 6:41 am) re: Lights, Action, No Desktop. (Bruce King: Sun, Jun 15, 2008, 6:18 pm) re: Lights, Action, No Desktop. (Jacob6601: Fri, Jun 27, 2008, 3:40 pm) re: Lights, Action, No Desktop. (Bruce King: Fri, Jun 27, 2008, 5:58 pm) re: Lights, Action, No Desktop. (Mr. T: Wed, Dec 10, 2008, 7:26 pm) Reply or follow-up to this message Search this forum Start a new thread on a different subject Report abuse of the forum Return to the Windows 95 Discussion Forum